Alex Rybakov vs William Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performances, Rybakov has displayed a stronger advantage in second serve points won, with a 46.58% success rate compared to Grant's 43.67%. This discrepancy in performance provides significant insight into the overall match prediction, given the high correlation between second serve effectiveness and match outcomes.

In terms of return game statistics, Grant has slightly outperformed Rybakov by winning 46.29% of opponents' second serve points against Rybakov’s 45.83%. When considering success on first serve returns, the numbers are similarly close, with Grant achieving a 25.82% success rate, marginally surpassing Rybakov’s 25.41%. Such statistics are instrumental in determining the preferred player in this head-to-head battle.

Examining how each player handles pressure situations further adds depth to our analysis. Rybakov has saved a commendable 54.86% of break points recently, while Grant has managed a slightly lower rate at 52.92%. This ability to save break points is crucial for those considering in-match betting predictions.

Over the past year, Rybakov has demonstrated superior performance, winning 65.38% of his matches, whereas Grant has maintained a win percentage of 49.12%. These records, alongside a review of the players' best and worst surfaces—where both excel on indoor hard courts—lay the foundation for an informed prediction.

Rybakov has predominately competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving considerable success with a 60.71% win rate. In contrast, Grant’s focus on Futures/Satellites/ITF matches has led to a 55.32% win rate. Although both players see their best results on indoor hard courts, these match venue differences should be considered when assessing their relative strengths.

In direct encounters, Rybakov has dominated Grant, winning all three previous matches and taking six out of seven sets played. Their last match, held on clay at the Sarasota Challenger, saw Rybakov winning convincingly 6-1, 6-3. This track record solidifies Rybakov’s advantage in head-to-head dynamics.

The average duration of previous matches between these players is 1 hour and 44 minutes, with only one of these contests extending to a deciding set—which Rybakov won. While neither player has triumphed in a tiebreak against one another, Rybakov's slight edge in all-deciding set matches provides an additional layer of confidence in his favor.

On assessing opponent quality, Rybakov has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 406.96, as compared to Grant’s 323.19, potentially offering him greater preparation against tougher adversaries.

With Rybakov also exhibiting a higher breakpoint conversion rate of 31.43% compared to Grant's 28.46%, he appears well-positioned to capitalize on crucial opportunities within the match. When considering all metrics and statistics, the data suggest a likely victory for Rybakov in their upcoming contest.